If Lydd airport were a Carlsberg advert...

Tags:

Lydd airport

...it would probably be the most useless airport in the world. When it's not masquerading as a mid-90s rave venue, Lydd serves 5,000 passengers a year - but wants to expand to 500,000.

There's just two obstacles in the way of the airport's meglomania - Dungeness nuclear power station and Dungeness RSPB sactuary - both of which are objecting to any increase in air passengers. The RSPB reserve is concerned about the bird population being disturbed by low-flying aircraft; the power station about the Kent population getting covered in toxic waste should a pilot veer off course.

Third London airport - in Hyde Park?

Hyde Park airport

In the 1960s the Roskill commission was tasked with producing a report into the best location for the third London airport. Its findings were reached though cost-benefit analysis, assigning an arbitary economic value to the unquantifiable. The report famously valued a Norman church at just £50,000 (the cost of its fire insurance).

As contermporary detractors noted, reports based on cost-benefit analysis carry the predjudices of their authors - and Roskill was no exception. The greatest weight was given to convenience of passengers, calculated by applying a per-minute value for any reduction in journey times to the combined number of minutes saved by the total number of passengers who might use the airport over a ten or twenty year period! Saving just one second per passenger would add up when aggregated over a decade or two - even if that second was saved by drastically increasing noise and pollution.

ASA puts Willie in hot water

Willie Walsh

Outspoken British Airways chief executive Willie Walsh has had his knuckles rapped for claiming that the third runway would reduce CO2 emissions.

The day after the consultation, Willie wrote to tens of thousands of members of BA's executive club, claiming that the third runway would save 330,000 tonnes of CO2 as less planes would need to stack in the skies above London, and urging them to write in support of expansion.

The Advertising Standards Agency wrote to Walsh, pointing out that the third runway would actually see 2.6 million tonnes more CO2, from the 220,000 extra flights each year, and ordered him to write a correction. Walsh has so far refused to say whether he will comply.

Ruth Kelly plays 20 questions

Ruth Kelly gets interviewed

The 2M Group - local authorities under the Heathrow flight path - have compiled a list of 20 questions for Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly, about the third runway.

Have you assessed the climate change impact of the extra 3 million tonnes per annum of CO2 admissions produced by the third runway alone?

BMI - another one bites the dust

Tags:

Another one bites the dust

You can almost hear Freddie humming along to this one - hot on the heels of BMI's ditching their Leeds-Bradford to Heathrow and Durham Tees Valley to Heathrow comes the news that they're also dropping their Inverness to Heathrow route.

Despite protestations from local Lib-Dem MP Danny Alexander ("disgraceful") it seems there's a perfectly good reason for their abandoning the service - no one was using it. According to Peter Spencer, BMI managing director, "there has been insufficient demand to operate a viable profitable operation on this route".

Apparently the combination of rising fuel costs and landing charges at Heathrow is causing these under-used routes to drop like flies. Could this be the first sign of the invisible hand clamping down on the 'cheap' flights bubble?

BMI vs the free market, round two

Plane Crazy

Radical anti-capitalists BMI are at it again - this time threatening to axe flights between Durham Tees Valley airport and Heathrow if BAA raises the price of landing slots at the London airport.

They've got MPs in such a tizz, that 14 have signed up to an Early Day Motion, asking the DfT to mark the flight as a 'public service', keeping landing costs lower than the market rate.